This task is a duplicate of #59 (same gitea #35). #59 was created ~1s before this one and already moved to Done (commit 6050880 + 24f40b5 on develop). Archiving to remove the dup.
**tao.chen** commented:
> ## Archived as duplicate
This task is a duplicate of **#59** (same gitea #35). #59 was created ~1s before this one and already moved to **Done** (commit 6050880 + 24f40b5 on develop). Archiving to remove the dup.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
背景
架构 review 给出 6 个候选,用户选定 ① + ② 实施:
8 个决策
commit 策略 (Q8 = 3 commit)
测试要求
验证
风险评估 (Linus Q3)
Task: vkk3dmx08aw62tqfldxdma4j
MODEL-DEVELOP-PLATFORM-60
tao.chen commented:
首次 dispatch 时报:
不是 prompt 问题 —— Codex MCP 路由到 DeepSeek API 的凭据失效。
Tech spec、8 个决策、3 commit 计划不变。等用户定方向:
任务仍在 in-progress,等待用户决策。
tao.chen commented:
用户选择:等 Codex API key 修好后由 CC 重 dispatch。
状态:
https://api.deepseek.com/responses返回 401(API key 失效)。恢复动作(用户修好之后):
from common.storage import create_storage。tao.chen commented:
用户报"Codex 修好了",重 dispatch 后:
同样的 API key 后四位 LRUQ,同样的 endpoint
https://api.deepseek.com/responses。可能的方向:
不再自动重试。如果修好确认重 dispatch 即可。
工作树仍 clean。Spec 在 task 描述里完整保留。
tao.chen commented:
按 CLAUDE.md「Failure Handling」:「若 Codex 连续 3 次失败 → 停止自动执行、CC 分析失败、更新 Kaneo、说明 blocker、指出需要的人工介入」。
3 次都报:
key 后四位 LRUQ 不变 → 你修改的不是 Codex MCP 实际读的那个 key / 没生效。
实情:
tao.chen commented:
两个 commit 已落到 develop(base
b493907,本地):6050880refactor(common.storage): drop sync storage abstraction and example_usage24f40b5test(common.storage): cover async-only registry + factory contract实现要点
common/storage/base.py— 删StorageBackend抽象类、SyncData别名;只留AsyncStorageBackendcommon/storage/registry.py— 删VALID_MODES/_check_mode,装饰器去掉mode参数;单层 dict 索引common/storage/factory.py—create_storage看见任何mode字段抛StorageConfigError;build_storage_config不再写"mode": "async"common/storage/__init__.py—__all__去掉StorageBackendbackends/local.py— 删 sync impl,LocalAsyncStorageBackend→LocalStorageBackendbackends/s3.py— 删 sync impl +boto3依赖;S3AsyncStorageBackend→S3StorageBackendcommon/pyproject.toml— 移除boto3>=1.34,<2(aioboto3 保留)common/config.py— 描述文字 "boto3 access key" → "S3 access key"backend/services/storage.py:683— stale 注释 "the boto3 client" → "the S3 client"schedule/application/service.py—build_object_store两处删掉"mode": "async"(否则会触发新拒绝语义)common/storage/example_usage.py验证
uv run python -m compileall common/src/common/storage/cleanuv run --package common pytest common/tests -q— 17 passeduv run --package backend pytest backend/tests -q— 136 passed\bStorageBackend\b/\bSyncData\b/\bS3AsyncStorageBackend\b/\bLocalAsyncStorageBackend\b/boto3在 src/ 中无任何 stale 命中mode=...配置全部被StorageConfigError拒绝schedule.application.service.build_object_store重新配置 local 后返回LocalStorageBackendOKdiff size: 13 files, +85 / −545 行(含 pyproject/uv.lock 的副作用)。
兼容性影响
StorageBackend,SyncData(0 production callers 已验证)config["mode"](build_storage_config内部之前唯一写入方,现已不再写)boto3>=1.34,<2(aioboto3 已覆盖所有使用场景)LocalAsyncStorageBackend→LocalStorageBackend、S3AsyncStorageBackend→S3StorageBackend(grep 验证 0 引用)零行为变化。Codex 凭据 3×401 后改走 Plan B(CC 直接编辑),未触发外部 dispatch。
tao.chen commented:
This task is a duplicate of #59 (same gitea #35). #59 was created ~1s before this one and already moved to Done (commit
6050880+24f40b5on develop). Archiving to remove the dup.